Thursday, September 27, 2012

Don't Buy the Whole Cow if You Just Want a Glass of Milk!

So you think you know what car you want. Now you have to decide whether to buy the car or lease it. For some, there is no dilemma because they either don't think leasing is right for them or they don't understand leasing. Either of those may be true, but you owe it to yourself to learn more about leasing before eliminating the leasing option.

Used vehicle prices have been very strong for the past eighteen months as I noted here. Manufacturers have used the shortage of late model used cars to their advantage in offering lease payments on relatively short leases (less than 30 months) knowing that the vehicles will come back off lease into a strong used car market. So the residual values (what the car is worth at the end of the lease) are higher which means a lower lease payments.

Here are some factors to consider as you make your next vehicle decision:


Leasing Advantages

  • Lower Monthly Payments - because you only pay for the portion of the car or truck that you actually use, your monthly lease payments can be up to 60% lower than for a purchase loan for the same car and same term. You get more car for your money. 
  • No (or low) Down Payment - when the lease begins, you'll just have to pay the first month's payment, title, taxes, registration, banking fees, and a security deposit. Some promotional lease deals require a down payment to get to the advertised payment. But because car leases require little or no down payment, your cash is freed up for other things. 
  • Warranty throughout Ownership - because the lease term is shorter than a purchase term, your vehicle is likely covered during the entire time you drive it.
  • New Vehicle More Often - drive a new vehicle every two to four years, depending on the term length of your lease.
  • Lower Tax Bite - you don't pay sales tax on the entire value of a leased vehicle as you would if you purchased. You're only taxed on the portion of the value that you use during your lease.
  • No Used-Car Hassles - the headaches of  negotiating a trade value or selling a used car are eliminated. When your lease ends, you simply turn it back to the leasing company and walk away.
  • Gap Coverage Included - Most car leases automatically include free "gap" protection in case your vehicle is totaled in an accident or stolen, which pays off your vehicle even if insurance doesn't cover the full loss. Loans do not generally come with automatic gap protection.
  • Option to Buy - you have the first option to purchase your leased vehicle at the end of the lease at a price that is determined at the time you lease the vehicle.
  • Reduce the Risk of Car Ownership - South Dakota has a damage disclosure law which requires that you disclose any damage to your vehicle exceeding $5,000 at the time you sell it. This typically diminished the value of the car significantly. Some states consider SD Damage Disclosure a "Salvage" brand on the title when the vehicle is titled in their state. If you are leasing the vehicle, though you are responsible for carrying insurance and repairing the vehicle, you are not liable for any diminution of value.

Leasing Disadvantages

  • Early Termination Cost - if you must terminate your lease before the end of your contract, the cost is usually very high, much higher than might be expected. However, cost can be minimized by making the right termination choices. But because the leases are so short (under 30 months). Most people end their lease on schedule and do not end early, which avoids all early termination costs.
  • Little or No Ownership Equity - because monthly lease payments are so low, you typically do not build ownership or trade-in value in your leased vehicle. It is possible, however, that the market value of a vehicle at lease-end is higher than the purchase option price specified in the lease contract — which means you may have some equity trade value. You could end up with a few thousand dollars of unexpected equity.
  • Excessive Mileage Charges - here in the Midwest, we tend to drive more miles annually than people do in other parts of the country. If you exceed the mileage allowance in your lease contract, you will be charged for the extra miles at a specified per-mile rate, usually a reasonable $0.20 per mile. A large mileage excess could result in a hefty charge, even at a reasonable per-mile rate. You can reduce your exposure and build the excess miles into the payment if you "buy" the extra miles you expect to drive at the time of lease signing. You avoid the higher end-of-lease charge this way. But be assured on one thing - you pay for those miles whether you lease or buy. The lease can offer a tidier way to incur those charges.
  • Excessive Wear-and-Tear Charges - If you return a leased vehicle at lease-end with excessive dents, scratches, or unrepaired accident damage, you will be charged — because those damages reduce the vehicle's value. Most lease companies clearly specify what is considered "excessive" so that you'll know if you should get it repaired before returning your vehicle. Get the repairs done yourself before you return the vehicle and avoid being charged.
  • If you have the option to buy the car at the end of the lease (as is often the case), you'll have to make that decision as soon as the lease ends, whereas if you owned the car you could decide exactly when to sell it.
Leasing isn't the right choice for everyone, but if you can take care of a vehicle properly, and can adhere to the mileage restrictions, it may be the best choice for you!

12/4/2012 UPDATE: Five myths about leasing a car
3/7/2013 UPDATE: Kiplinger: Smart reasons to lease your next car

Wednesday, September 26, 2012

September 2012 SDADA Column


An adjective used to describe people who are environmentally aware (flower child, tree-hugger), open-minded, left-winged, socially aware and active, queer or queer-positive, anti-oppressive/discriminatory (racial, sexual, gender, class, age, etc.) with an organic and natural emphasis on living, who will usually refrain from consuming or using anything containing animals and animal by-products (for health and/or environmental reasons), as well as limit consumption of what he or she does consume, as granola people are usually concerned about wasting resources. Usually buy only fair-trade goods and refrain from buying from large corporations, as most exploit the environment as well as their workers, which goes against granola core values. The choice of not removing body hair (see amazon) and drug use are not characteristics that define granola people, and people, regardless of granola status, may or may not partake in said activities. This definition is sometimes confused with hippy.
-- Definition of a "Granola" according to Urbandictionary.com.

The "granolas" got a big win last month and almost no one noticed. The main stream media was so wound up about the Republican Convention and hurricane Isaac that they totally missed this one.

The Obama administration enacted the new corporate average fuel economy standards. Automakers will be forced to double the fuel efficiency of their vehicles to a fleet average of 54.5 miles per gallon by 2025.
Please don't get me wrong. Like most other car dealers I know, I am all for increased fuel economy and less dependence on foreign oil. But I want, and need, to be able to sell vehicles that my customers want to buy.

South Dakota is truck country. Our customers are farmers, ranchers, outdoors men and small business people for whom their vehicle is more than just a means of transportation. It is a tool with which they go about doing their work. They cannot get the job done in some bubble-shaped plug-in hybrid.

Not only will these new standards reduce the availability of trucks (if not eliminate them completely), you can expect the average price of vehicles to go up by $3,000 to $5,500 per vehicle as well. If the consumer cannot afford the new vehicles, they will not buy the vehicles and all the "fuel savings" is lost anyway.

The "granolas" will tell you that people will save that money in fuel. One problem, banks don't lend on fuel savings. They lend on equity and payment to income data. In 27 years, I have never had a bank contract buyer as me how much to factor into the equation for customers’ fuel savings. So if the customer can't buy the vehicle, he cannot save the fuel cost!

This will also cause a loss of jobs in the automobile manufacturing segment as customers are eliminated from the market. But then the Obama administration has never shown a great deal of regard for jobs.

The "granolas" will tell you that some thirteen automakers agreed to these new standards. Well, let's see, who those might be? Should we start guessing with those who do not have an entry in the full-size truck or SUV market?

So the "granolas" push us toward smaller (less safe), more expensive and less utilitarian vehicles.

I wonder if the "granolas" have ever considered where the electricity for those plug-in hybrids comes from. 54% of the electricity in our country is produced by coal - but then they want to rid us of that as well!



NADA Launches National Ad Campaign Against Stair-Step Incentive Programs

As most of you know, NADA Chairman Bill Underiner appointed me to the Industry Relations Task Force on Facility Image Programs and Multi-Tier Pricing. Our Task Force has found that a legal challenge against the manufacturers on the stairi-step pricing issue may be a tall mountain to climb. So we have chosen to mount a public relations effort against the manufacturers on this issue.  
To that end, we kicked off a national print ad campaign in September detailing the many negative aspects of manufacturer stair-step incentive programs.

The full-page ad, “Stair-Step Incentive Programs are Bad for the Auto Industry,” below, began running in Automotive News.

The ad points out that “stair-step programs create too many negatives to justify their use.”

Stair-step programs “harm brand credibility; hurt dealers of all sizes; undermine relationships between dealers and their customers; have an adverse affect on CSI scores; and destroy consumer confidence in dealers -- and in manufacturers’ brands.”

Thursday, September 13, 2012

Why Didn't Anyone Ask That Before?

What is anti-colonialism and what does it have to do with the 2012 American Presidential election? Dinesh D'Souza's Obama's America: Unmaking the American Dream explores that and so much more about our 44th president.

D'Souza is a political commentator, public intellectual and author who is currently the President of The King's College in New York City. He served as a policy advisor to President Ronald Reagan. He has done a magnificent job or researching and documenting this book.

It builds on his previous book, The Roots of Obama’s Rage (which I also thought was a very interesting read), upon which the movie 2016: Obama's America, the movie, is based.

D'Souza believes that another four years will allow Obama to finish the job he has started in his first term, that is to further diminish America's economy and her role in the world. He suggests Obama's ideology is global justice which, to him, means a redistribution of wealth and power away from America and towards the rest of the world.

But it is the building of the story and the documentation - with literally a tsunami of evidence - that is so compelling. D'Souza is a brilliant guy and that seems so evident as you read this book.

I wish everyone would read this, consider the questions and decide for themselves. Whether you like Obama or not, whether you'll vote for him or not, this books vets him as he should have been vetted prior to his election in 2008.

Tuesday, September 4, 2012

The Granolas' Big Win

An adjective used to describe people who are environmentally aware (flower child, tree-hugger), open-minded, left-winged, socially aware and active, queer or queer-positive, anti-oppressive/discriminatory (racial, sexual, gender, class, age, etc.) with an organic and natural emphasis on living, who will usually refrain from consuming or using anything containing animals and animal by-products (for health and/or environmental reasons), as well as limit consumption of what he or she does consume, as granola people are usually concerned about wasting resources. Usually buy only fair-trade goods and refrain from buying from large corporations, as most exploit the environment as well as their workers, which goes against granola core values. The choice of not removing body hair (see amazon) and drug use are not characteristics that define granola people, and people, regardless of granola status, may or may not partake in said activities. This definition is sometimes confused with hippy.
-- Definition of a "Granola" according to Urbandictionary.com.

The "granolas" got a big win last week and almost no one noticed. The main stream media was so wound up about the Republican Convention and hurricane Isaac that they totally missed this one.

The Obama administration enacted the new corporate average fuel economy standards. Automakers will be forced to double the fuel efficiency of their vehicles to a fleet average of 54.5 miles per gallon by 2025.

Please don't get me wrong. I, like most other car dealers I know, am all for increased fuel economy and less dependence on foreign oil. But I want, and need, to be able to sell vehicles that my customers want to buy.

South Dakota is truck country. My customers are farmers, ranchers, outdoors men and small business people for whom their vehicle is more than just a means of transportation. It is a tool with which they go about doing their work. They cannot get the job done in some bubble-shaped plug-in hybrid.

Not only will these new standards reduce the availability of trucks (if not eliminate them completely), you can expect the average price of vehicles to go up by $3,000 to $5,500 per vehicle as well. If the consumer cannot afford the new vehicles, they will not buy the vehicles and all the "fuel savings" is lost anyway.

The "granolas" will tell you that people will save that money in fuel. One problem, banks don't lend on fuel savings. They lend on equity and payment to income data. In 27 years, I have never had a bank contract buyer as me how much to factor into the equation for customers fuel savings. So if the customer can't buy the vehicle, he cannot save the fuel cost!

This will also cause a loss of jobs in the automobile manufacturing segment as customers are eliminated from the market. But then the Obama administration has never shown a great deal of regard for jobs.

The "granolas" will tell you that some thirteen automakers agreed to these new standards. Well, let's see, who those might be? Should we start guessing with those who do not have an entry in the full-size truck or SUV market?

So the "granolas" push us toward smaller (less safe), more expensive and less utilitarian vehicles.

I wonder if the "granolas" have ever considered where the electricity for those plug-in hybrids comes from. 54% of the electricity in our country is produced by coal - but then they want to rid us of that as well!