Showing posts with label legislature. Show all posts
Showing posts with label legislature. Show all posts

Thursday, January 15, 2015

January 2015 SDADA Column

It goes without saying that the NADA Director's Column is intended to be about NADA issues. While I have discussed South Dakota issues in this space before, they have not usually been the primary focus. But he South Dakota Automobile Dealers Association has a very important bill in front of the legislature this year and I feel compelled to address it.

The bill will repeal the South Dakota damage disclosure. We have been down this road before but the hail storms last summer seem to have raised awareness of what a bad law that our current damage disclosure law is. In fact, several legislators have learned firsthand about "diminution of value".

The used car dealers, insurance companies, body shops and salvage dealers have also expressed support of this bill. Through the years, we have struggled to get all these parties on the same page. As the saying goes, "the stars have aligned".

Two years ago, I added a body shop in my Ford store. Since then, I've seen the lengths to which people will go to avoid having to disclose damage on their vehicle. They have learned how a damage disclosure can crush the value of a late model vehicle. If you give people a reason to lie, cheat or steal, don't be surprised when they do so. Our current damage disclosure law causes people to do just that.

I have never talked to a member of SDADA that thinks the damage disclosure law is a good one. We have discussed raising the damage limit or excluding certain equipment. That is simply spraying perfume on the pig.

This is our best opportunity to kill this law. We need your help. Please talk to your legislators about this bill. Make certain that they understand it and why we want to do it. Point out to them that all of this information is now public (Carfax, Auto Check, etc.) and that many of us are providing this information to your customers at no cost before they buy your vehicle.

Get involved. Make a phone call. Let's put a stake in the heart of the damage disclosure law once and for all!

Dealers Much More than "Middleman" for Consumers

Tesla's sales model had stirred much discussion about the role of the traditional automobile dealer. We have been cast as everything from oligopolists, who just want to preserve an antiquated system, to middlemen, who add no value to the process.

NADA's arsenal of resources intended to get the dealers' story out continues to grow. The videos and other materials found here make a great short presentation for your Kiwanis or Rotary meeting. Please consider spreading the word.

NADA’s “Get the Facts” initiative is designed to inform policymakers, opinion leaders and the media about the numerous benefits of the dealer franchise network through a variety of multimedia resources and videos available at nada.org/getthefacts.

The current franchised new-car dealer model has benefited consumers, manufacturers and local communities for nearly a century. It is supported by both dealers and factories as the best and most efficient way to buy, sell, service and finance cars in the marketplace. NADA’s Get the Facts page sets the record straight about the benefits of the franchise system for consumers and local communities all over America.

This campaign emphasizes that local franchised auto dealers: fiercely compete for business and drive consumer prices down; take the side of consumers in warranty and safety recalls; create good-paying local jobs and significant tax revenue for local communities; and simplify an otherwise complex car-buying experience.

Dealers and local dealer associations are encouraged to link to the videos on their websites, and with permission can co-brand the videos with their own logos. For more information about co-branding content from NADA’s “Get the Facts” initiative, contact publicaffairs@nada.org.


Tuesday, December 17, 2013

December 2013 SDADA Column

One of a trade association’s (i.e South Dakota Automobile Dealers Association or National Automobile Dealers Association) main functions is as a representative body. A trade association advances the collective view and position of its members to government departments, agencies, regulators and legislators. It also communicates the collective view and position to the media and other opinion-makers.

It is in this capacity that the SDADA will work to work to repeal South Dakota's Damage Disclosure law in the upcoming legislative session. I know each of you recognize the many deficiencies of this law so I will not discuss that in this space.

But I will offer this experience. I opened a body shop at my Ford store in February of 2013. It has been truly amazing how many consumers have asked us to work with them to keep the damage under the $5,000 threshold for a damage disclosure. This law does not work for consumers, dealers, body shops or insurance companies. No one is well served by the law. IT IS A BAD LAW!

In order to repeal the law, however, it will take a concerted effort by our entire organization - I mean dealers and their staffs, our association staff and our vendor/partners. It is a battle worthy of fighting but we must work together to be successful. We will need support from ALL SDADA members. That means coming to our annual legislative reception, being willing to testify, making phone calls to legislators among other efforts.

We don't yet know what we will have for opposition but I know we can win this issue regardless of opposition because it is an outdated law, our organization commands great respect among legislators and we have the political capital necessary to win. But it will take a broad, grassroots effort.

I am committed to do what I can to repeal this law. I urge you to consider how you might help with this effort!

Bill to Reduce Paperwork at Auto Dealerships Advances in House

The House Energy and Commerce Committee on Wednesday approved by voice vote a bipartisan bill, H.R. 724, which would eliminate some red tape required by the Environmental Protection Agency when buying a new car or truck. The bill would repeal a 1977 mandate, which requires dealers to certify that a vehicle complies with the Clean Air Act. (This form is required to be presented by the dealer to the purchaser of a new vehicle even though all vehicles must comply with the Clean Air Act before being sold in the United States. Additionally, a Clean Air Act certification sticker can be found under the hood of most vehicles, or in the owner's manual, making an additional certification by the dealer redundant.) The legislation now goes to the floor of the House for consideration.

NADA Convention Mobile App for 2014 Now Available

The mobile app for the 2014 NADA Convention & Expo is now available for download for smart phones and tablets. The free app, which syncs with myNADAplanner, allows attendees to maximize their convention experience by providing: up-to-the-minute updates on workshop sessions and events; workshop handouts and presentations that can be downloaded; a customized schedule builder; walking maps to navigate the convention center and expo floor with exhibitor descriptions and booth locations; and tools to stay organized.

The app is available for iPhone, iPod Touch, iPad and Android devices. To download, visit the App Store or Google Play Store and search for NADA2014.

Saturday, February 23, 2013

Please Define "Local Control"

Bob Mercer, on his "Pure Pierre Politics" blog, has an interesting post about school districts and exclusive contracts. This is an issue being debated in our legislature this year and Mercer's post looks at both sides of the issue.

SB 119 would ban school districts from entering into exclusive broadcasting (read "sports broadcasting") contracts with a local broadcaster or newspaper. A coalition of broadcasters and newspapers are asking the legislature to bar these exclusive contracts for regular-season high school sports.

Do we really need our legislators deciding this issue? Are local school boards not competent to determine what is best for their district? Isn't this just a end run by broadcasters and newspapers in certain communities who do not want to pay up for the right to valuable programming?

As an advertiser, I have to make decisions every day about whether an advertising source offers a value commensurate with the cost involved. I might think a source has value, but if it doesn't justify the price, I do not advertise there. It's not rocket science. It's a business decision that every business makes every day. Broadcasters and newspapers need to make a business decision.

If a school district decides to grant exclusivity, we will find out very quickly what the value of this programming really is. While some of the larger schools districts may have an asset, smaller school districts may find that they should have to pay to have their games broadcast. Many radio stations are doing a public service by broadcasting smaller schools games. Many advertisers are supplementing those services with little to no value in return.

Message to the broadcasters and newspapers in South Dakota: If you want the programming, bid more money. Quit whining and crying about not having access. You have the opportunity for access, what you do with it is up to you. Warning: If you pay too much, you will have to ask too much for advertising on your programming. Advertisers may see fit to take a pass on your programming. It's a business decision.

To South Dakota legislators: Please don't show your hypocrisy. You cannot be for "local control" and "less government" and support this ban. This is a local control issue. We do not need you to stick your nose into our school district's business. If our local school board makes bad decisions, they will have to face the electorate. That is how the system works. I know you are all brilliant, but you do not know what is best for the Chamberlain School District! I trust my local board of education to make this decision. BUTT OUT!!

To South Dakota school boards: Be careful as you make this decision. You may make money on this programming but you may lose the support of broadcasters, newspapers and businesses that make many, many contributions (not just monetary) to your schools.

To supporters of SB 119: Why is not acceptable for the school districts to grant exclusive rights to their events but it is perfectly fine to grant the South Dakota High School Activities Association exclusivity for the TV broadcast rights?

Message to all: Please keep the money-hungry, power-grabbing, self-serving South Dakota High School Activities Association as far away from this issue as possible. If you think you have a problem now, get them involved. You will really have a problem then!